Search Techrankup

Find rankings, comparisons and guides.

Choose a language

Smartphone processor performance ranking

Compare smartphone CPU and GPU performance with the new Geekbench 6 and 3DMark ranking. The older chart is available below for reference.

2026-10-02
  1. Smartphone Processor Ranking
  2. Smartphone GPU Ranking
  3. Exynos
  4. Helio
  5. Dimensity
  6. Kirin
  7. Snapdragon
  8. Apple A-series

The new chart appears first. The older chart remains below for reference.

View new chart · View older chart

Each chart scales its leader to 100%. Compare percentages within the same chart; new and older scores are not directly comparable.

Benchmark scores are a guide, not a guarantee of sustained gaming performance. Results vary with the phone, cooling and software.

New ranking chart

The new ranking combines Geekbench 6 Multi-Core CPU scores and 3DMark Wild Life Extreme graphics scores. Each benchmark is normalized separately, then given equal weight. Only selected chipsets with both scores are included.

Smartphone Processor Ranking
Relative performance
-
Higher is better
CPU · Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
+
Graphics · 3DMark Wild Life Extreme
InformationFind
.
.
.
Apple A20 Pro
100%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8 Elite
79.2%
.
.
.
Apple A19 Pro
73.9%
.
.
.
Xring O1
72.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 V Series
71.5%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
69.6%
.
.
.
Apple A19
66.4%
.
.
.
Exynos 2500
63.7%
.
.
.
Apple A18 Pro
61.5%
.
.
.
Apple A18
57.3%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
54.1%
.
.
.
Google Tensor G6
49.5%
.
.
.
Exynos 2400e
49.4%
.
.
.
Google Tensor G5
43.9%
.
.
.
Kirin 9030 Pro
38.9%
.
.
.
Kirin 9020
31.2%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
28.8%
.
.
.
Exynos 1680
27.5%
.
.
.
Kirin 9030S
26.8%
.
.
.
Kirin 9010
26.5%
.
.
.
Exynos 1580
23.1%
.
.
.
Kirin 8020
21.3%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
20.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 6 Gen 5
20%
.
.
.
Exynos 1480
19.5%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
17.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7200
17.1%
.
.
.
Exynos 1610
16.5%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7300 Max
16.4%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 6s Gen 4
15.9%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7100
15.3%
.
.
.
Unisoc T9300
10.6%
.
.
.
Dimensity 6400
10.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 4 Gen 5
10.5%
.
.
.
Dimensity 6300
10.5%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
10.3%
.
.
.
Helio G200
9.9%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
9.8%
.
.
.
Unisoc T7250
6.7%
.
.
.
Helio G81
6.4%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%

Older ranking chart

This older chart uses the previous scoring data and is kept for reference. View new chart

Smartphone Processor Ranking
Relative performance
-
Higher is better
CPU
+
Graphics
InformationFind
.
.
.
Apple A17 Pro
100%
.
.
.
A16 Bionic
92.4%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
89.2%
.
.
.
A15 Bionic (5 core GPU)
85.7%
.
.
.
Dimensity 9200+
79.9%
.
.
.
A15 Bionic (4 core GPU)
76.7%
.
.
.
Dimensity 9200
76.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
72.5%
.
.
.
Dimensity 9000+
69.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8300
66.9%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
66.7%
.
.
.
Dimensity 9000
66%
.
.
.
A14 Bionic
62.8%
.
.
.
Exynos 2200
60%
.
.
.
Google Tensor G3
59.7%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8200
58.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8250
58.2%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 888+ 5G
58.2%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G
57.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 888 5G
56%
.
.
.
Kirin 9000 5G
55.9%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 888 4G
55.8%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
55.6%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8100-Ultra
54.9%
.
.
.
Kirin 9000s
54.3%
.
.
.
Exynos 2100
54.3%
.
.
.
Kirin 9000E 5G
53.6%
.
.
.
Google Tensor G2
53.1%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8100-Max
52.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8100
51.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 870 5G
51.2%
.
.
.
Google Tensor
50.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 865+
50.1%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8000 Max
49.6%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1200 Max
49.3%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8000
49.2%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 865 5G
48.4%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1300
47.6%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1200
47.5%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8020
47.4%
.
.
.
Exynos 1080
46.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 8050
45.7%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1000+
43.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1100
42.3%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 860
41.9%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 780G
41.2%
.
.
.
Kirin 990E 5G
40.1%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1000L
40.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
40%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 778G+ 5G
39.3%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 782G
38.7%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 778G 5G
37.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 778G 4G
37.6%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7200
35.7%
.
.
.
Exynos 1380
35%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
34.6%
.
.
.
Kirin 985 5G
33.1%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1000C
33.1%
.
.
.
Dimensity 820
31.9%
.
.
.
Kirin 820
30.9%
.
.
.
Kirin 820E
30.3%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7050
30.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 920
30.1%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1080
28.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7030
28.8%
.
.
.
Unisoc T820
28.4%
.
.
.
Dimensity 900
27.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 1050
27.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 800
26.9%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 768G 5G
25.2%
.
.
.
Exynos 1280
25%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7025
25%
.
.
.
Exynos 1330
24.8%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 695 5G
24.5%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 765G 5G
24.3%
.
.
.
Dimensity 7020
24.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 930
24.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
24%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 750G 5G
23.7%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 750 5G
23.5%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 765 5G
23.4%
.
.
.
Dimensity 800U
23.3%
.
.
.
Exynos 880
23.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 732G
22.2%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 720G
22.2%
.
.
.
Dimensity 6080
22%
.
.
.
Helio G95
21.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 810
21.8%
.
.
.
Helio G99
21.8%
.
.
.
Dimensity 6300
21.6%
.
.
.
Helio G96
21.6%
.
.
.
Dimensity 6100+
21.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 690 5G
21.3%
.
.
.
Dimensity 720
21.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 480+ 5G
20.7%
.
.
.
Dimensity 6020
20.3%
.
.
.
Dimensity 700
20.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 480 5G
19.6%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 685
18.8%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
18.7%
.
.
.
Unisoc T618
17.9%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 678
17.8%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 680 4G
17.3%
.
.
.
Unisoc T700
17.3%
.
.
.
Unisoc T606
17.3%
.
.
.
Unisoc T610
17.3%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 680G 4G
17.2%
.
.
.
Helio P95
16%
.
.
.
Helio G88
15.9%
.
.
.
Helio G85
15.4%
.
.
.
Helio G80
14.8%
.
.
.
Unisoc Tiger T616
14.8%
.
.
.
Helio G70
14.7%
.
.
.
Unisoc Tiger T612
14.1%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 662
14%
.
.
.
Kirin 710A
13.5%
.
.
.
Snapdragon 460
13.3%
.
.
.
Exynos 850
11.9%
.
.
.
Helio G35
10.1%
.
.
.
Helio G37
10.1%
.
.
.
JLQ JR510
10%
.
.
.
Helio G36
9.8%
.
.
.
Helio G25
8.7%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%

Compare the listed smartphone chipsets by combined CPU and GPU performance. The new benchmark-based chart comes first, with the older ranking below.
About this article
Show less
artimg
logo
Techrankup

Help us improve Techrankup

Found a mistake or have an idea? Let us know.

Only if you would like a reply.

Sent privately to Techrankup with this page’s address and language.